Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
JC Mieyli wrote: baltec1 wrote: JC Mieyli wrote: how many hacs does it take to kill a rattlesnake Depends. Are you trying to compare a cruiser with a pirate battleship? im just asking how many hacs it takes to kill a rattlesnake al...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.21 13:42:27
|
2. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
These look like they will out tank and out DPS HACs still.
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.19 16:16:20
|
3. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Why did the Proteus Drone synthesis projector take such a large hit to the drone bay size? 175m I very small for having 100mbps
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.18 11:22:06
|
4. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I would expect it's because they are updating to the new figures.
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.17 22:46:46
|
5. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: You do have to consider right now the Proteus gets a maximum of 100Mpbs and 225 m3 of drone bay, so in that respect there would be very little change, assuming it went down to 200 m3. in contr...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.17 13:23:34
|
6. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
You do have to consider right now the Proteus gets a maximum of 100Mpbs and 225 m3 of drone bay, so in that respect there would be very little change, assuming it went down to 200 m3. in contrast the VNI gets 125Mbps and only 200 m3 of drone bay.
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.16 16:41:51
|
7. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Noxisia Arkana wrote: @Omnathious Deninard: I'm going to quote fozzie here and say that I think the point is to make the ships unique from other ships not more similar. But I get what you're going for. As someone that lived out of a domi for wa...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.16 15:53:52
|
8. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: Noxisia Arkana wrote: I personally think the group is very focused on trying to make sure that T3s aren't going to obsolete whole ship classes; I personally struggle with how can you make ...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.16 15:12:46
|
9. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Noxisia Arkana wrote: I personally think the group is very focused on trying to make sure that T3s aren't going to obsolete whole ship classes; I personally struggle with how can you make recons and HACs relevant outside of cost (or recons bet...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.16 12:29:38
|
10. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Is this now touching the realm of power creep? At least in terms of the re-balance?
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.11 14:44:12
|
11. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
That seems to fit with the norm for caldari cruisers, looking through the ships it appeared at first glance only one had a full flight of light drones. Though we have to wait until the new stat sheets are released before we have an opportunity to ...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.11 01:10:55
|
12. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: zbaaca wrote: Mhari Dson wrote: I also find the lack of drones on the caldari missile sub to be a hinderance as well. proposal on that bieng remove 1 launcher, shift 1 high to a low, add 25 bandwidth, 50 bay. cal...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.10 22:42:19
|
13. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: One more thing I would like to leave here: at the end of October last year I made this thread about how I think the T3Cs could be redone. The conversation didn't go far and the thread was locked due to inactivity, most l...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.10 13:09:56
|
14. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Chance Ravinne wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: Here is an idea that most likely will break everything, and would probably require to change the current approach, but I just want to leave it here. Rare, pirate faction subsystems. One subsystem...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.09 14:58:40
|
15. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Rawketsled wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: Rawketsled wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: With the expected nerfs to align time and sig resolution, nullification without cloak is probably a 100% chance of getting caught at a bubble cam...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.08 12:33:40
|
16. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Rawketsled wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: With the expected nerfs to align time and sig resolution, nullification without cloak is probably a 100% chance of getting caught at a bubble camp. Is that objectively a bad thing? Beyond maki...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.08 03:25:52
|
17. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
With the expected nerfs to align time and sig resolution, nullification without cloak is probably a 100% chance of getting caught at a bubble camp.
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.08 01:35:09
|
18. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I know CCP is in process of full stats as well as overhauling how subsystems affect the hull, I'm an anxiously awaiting V2 of the changes.
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.07 16:13:09
|
19. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Bronson Hughes wrote: baltec1 wrote: Third, for me, is that cov ops cloaks and nullification on any ship should not be allowed. on a cruiser sized hull it just means it is impossible to stop such a ship. People will try to push keeping it be...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.07 14:42:20
|
20. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Toobo wrote: TBH, putting in a game mechanic that brings financial gain obviously makes sense for any commercial company Then they could bring back clone costs, that removed a lot of SP from the game from players who forgot to upgrade there c...
- by Omnathious Deninard - at 2017.06.03 13:52:32
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |